After the immigrant haters in Georgia's Senate passed SB458 to prevent undocumented immigrants from attending any Georgia college or university,a study by the Chronicle for Higher Education states that in Georgia, an average of only 24 percent of entering college in the freshmen year get a degree within four years in Georgia’s public four-year colleges. This is well below the national average. Across Georgia, only 52 percent of students complete a four-year degree within six years.
A dim outlook over Georgia's college education for mostly U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents. It is even more idiotic to deny public education to undocumented immigrants who have more of an incentive to graduate well. Our state needs more educated people, hopefully we will have some more educated people in the Georgia Senate and House in the future.
Friday, March 9, 2012
Tuesday, March 6, 2012
SB458 PASSES GEORGIA SENATE AGAINST UNDOCUMENTED STUDENTS GOING TO COLLEGE
The Georgia Senate just passed SB458 - a bill barring undocumented immigrants from attending any public universities in Georgia.
The Republicans sponsored this bill (of course), with sponsor in chief Barry Loudermilk, R-Cassville. It passed the senate 34-19 yesterday.
Last year, the Georgia board of regents voted a measure to prohibit undocumented immigrants from attending the five of the most popular schools in cases they would be taking a slot that otherwise would go to a legal U.S. resident. These schools include UGA, Georgia State, Georgia Tech, Georgia Health Sciences University and Georgia College and State University.
The bill's sponsors object to having taxpayers fund benefits for undocumented immigrants, even those who are not at fault for their situation because they were brought to the U.S. at a very young age by their parents and want to improve their lives by going to college. This bill is morally wrong but it did not stop these people from sponsoring it or signing it into law.
Denying students access to higher education will hurt us in the long run because the less educated the workers are, the less they usually make and less taxes they pay over their lifetime. We should support people trying to improve their lives by going to college. These students pay out of state tuition anyway so they pay a lot more (about 4 times as much) as an in-state applicant so the state is not subsidizing much, if any.
The bill now moves to the Georgia House of Representatives where it is likely to pass even though it should not pass, both for moral reasons and economic reasons. But that never stopped any politician from voting a bill into law.
The Republicans sponsored this bill (of course), with sponsor in chief Barry Loudermilk, R-Cassville. It passed the senate 34-19 yesterday.
Last year, the Georgia board of regents voted a measure to prohibit undocumented immigrants from attending the five of the most popular schools in cases they would be taking a slot that otherwise would go to a legal U.S. resident. These schools include UGA, Georgia State, Georgia Tech, Georgia Health Sciences University and Georgia College and State University.
The bill's sponsors object to having taxpayers fund benefits for undocumented immigrants, even those who are not at fault for their situation because they were brought to the U.S. at a very young age by their parents and want to improve their lives by going to college. This bill is morally wrong but it did not stop these people from sponsoring it or signing it into law.
Denying students access to higher education will hurt us in the long run because the less educated the workers are, the less they usually make and less taxes they pay over their lifetime. We should support people trying to improve their lives by going to college. These students pay out of state tuition anyway so they pay a lot more (about 4 times as much) as an in-state applicant so the state is not subsidizing much, if any.
The bill now moves to the Georgia House of Representatives where it is likely to pass even though it should not pass, both for moral reasons and economic reasons. But that never stopped any politician from voting a bill into law.
Thursday, March 1, 2012
11TH CIRCUIT HEARS ORAL ARGUMENTS ON GEORGIA AND ALABAMA IMMIGRATION LAWS
Today the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals held oral arguments in the cases of Georgia's HB87 and Alabama's HB56 anti-immigration laws. The oral arguments took several hours and the court was very interested and engaged and the justices asked many thoughtful questions.
The court is not going to rule on this soon, but planning to wait until the U.S. Supreme Court rules on the Arizona immigration law case. Arguments for that case are set for April 25.
It will be a while before we hear anything, and it all depends on the Supreme Court. The 11th Circuit cannot rule differently.
The court is not going to rule on this soon, but planning to wait until the U.S. Supreme Court rules on the Arizona immigration law case. Arguments for that case are set for April 25.
It will be a while before we hear anything, and it all depends on the Supreme Court. The 11th Circuit cannot rule differently.
Tuesday, February 28, 2012
NFAP POLICY BRIEF FINDS HIGH DENIAL RATES FOR L-1 AND H-1B PETITIONS BY USCIS
The National Foundation for American Policy (NFAP) just issued a policy brief analyzing the government’s data which reveals that USCIS, our immigration agency, dramatically increased the denial rate of L-1 and H-1B petitions over the past four years, harming the competitiveness of U.S. employers and encouraging companies to keep more jobs and resources outside the United States.
This report is alarming and confirms what us immigration law practitioners have experienced in the past few years. It proves that USCIS adjudicators have artificially and arbitrarily increased the number of denials and time-consuming requests for additional evidence from employers, keeping more highly skilled professional workers outside the United States despite no change in law or regulations.
The visa that received the most scrutiny by USCIS is the L-1B visa used by international companies to bring their specialized knowledge workers. In FY 2011 63 percent of all L-1B petitions received a Request for Evidence and 27 percent were issued a denial, which means USCIS denied or delayed between 63 percent to 90 percent of all L-1B petitions during that time. Compared with only a 7 percent denial rate in FY2007, and only a 2 percent cases where USCIS requested additional evidence in FY2004, combined with the fact that employers now are much more selective about who they sponsor for this visa, this is a deliberate effort of USCIS to limit the use of this visa and it directly hurts international businesses because it is costing them millions in project delays and penalties.
The report stated that denial rates for H-1B petitions increased from 11 percent in FY 2007 to 29 percent in FY 2009, and remained higher than in the past for H-1Bs at 21 percent in FY 2010 and 17 percent in FY 2011. For H-1B petitions, the Request for Evidence rate rose from 4 percent in FY 2004, to 18 percent by FY 2007, to a high of 35 percent in FY 2009. In FY 2011, the rate for request for additional evidence for H-1B petitions was 26 percent.
It is alarming that almost a third of the H-1B visa cases are significantly delayed or denied by USCIS and employers are burdened with significant costs to respond to them and delay their projects. There is no logical reason why companies that are now more selective in hiring professional workers should face such advanced scrutiny where there is now more than twice the chance the application will be denied compared to prior years.
The L-1A visa is used by international companies to transfer managers and executives into the United States. Denial rates for L-1A petitions increased from 8 percent in FY 2007 to 14 percent in FY 2011. The Request for Evidence rate for L-1A petitions increased from 4 percent in FY 2004, to 24 percent in FY 2007, up to 51 percent in FY 2011.
The fact that during the most recent fiscal year, USCIS arbitrarily increased the denial rate or delay rate to half of the cases filed in this category of international managers or executives is outrageous. These are people we want to welcome to this country because they work for multinational corporations that make significant investments in the United States. They will not continue to do that if they will not be able to transfer their managers or executives from abroad to oversee expansion and similar projects.
The denial rates also increased for O-1A petitions, which are used for people with an extraordinary ability, who are in the top of their fields in the sciences, education, business, or athletics. Denials for O-1A petitions rose from 4 percent in FY 2008, to 10 percent just one year later in FY 2009, increased again to 11 percent in FY 2010, and stood at 8 percent in FY 2011. For O-1A petitions, the Request for Evidence rate increased from 1 percent in FY 2004, to 13 percent in FY 2007, and then more than doubled to 28 percent in FY 2009, 30 percent in FY 2010, and 27 percent in FY 2011.
This deliberate effort of USCIS to create additional hurdles on the O-1 visa applicants, who are the best and brightest in the world in what they do, is more than just bad for business. It is even worse for extraordinary researchers and scientists who are supposed to help us find cure to diseases or find the next new technology out there to solve many of our problems. These are the people the United States needs to attract and welcome with less hurdles, not more. Instead, the immigration agency is creating additional barriers to their entering the country by artificially increasing the heightened scrutiny and denial rates.
The best thing the immigration service can do is to make the process easier for all these professionals and companies because they are the kind of people we want to attract here and they represent the interests of billions of dollars in investments in this country. If USCIS wants to help create jobs, it needs to remove barriers to entry of the best and brightest, not create additional obstacles as it currently does. I think more employers now are willing to sue the government in order to protect their rights. We have helped a number of them do that successfully so there are options but they are more costly and difficult.
To read the NFAP report, go to: http://www.nfap.com/pdf/NFAP_Policy_Brief.USCIS_and_Denial_Rates_of_L1_and_H%201B_Petitions.February2012.pdf
This report is alarming and confirms what us immigration law practitioners have experienced in the past few years. It proves that USCIS adjudicators have artificially and arbitrarily increased the number of denials and time-consuming requests for additional evidence from employers, keeping more highly skilled professional workers outside the United States despite no change in law or regulations.
The visa that received the most scrutiny by USCIS is the L-1B visa used by international companies to bring their specialized knowledge workers. In FY 2011 63 percent of all L-1B petitions received a Request for Evidence and 27 percent were issued a denial, which means USCIS denied or delayed between 63 percent to 90 percent of all L-1B petitions during that time. Compared with only a 7 percent denial rate in FY2007, and only a 2 percent cases where USCIS requested additional evidence in FY2004, combined with the fact that employers now are much more selective about who they sponsor for this visa, this is a deliberate effort of USCIS to limit the use of this visa and it directly hurts international businesses because it is costing them millions in project delays and penalties.
The report stated that denial rates for H-1B petitions increased from 11 percent in FY 2007 to 29 percent in FY 2009, and remained higher than in the past for H-1Bs at 21 percent in FY 2010 and 17 percent in FY 2011. For H-1B petitions, the Request for Evidence rate rose from 4 percent in FY 2004, to 18 percent by FY 2007, to a high of 35 percent in FY 2009. In FY 2011, the rate for request for additional evidence for H-1B petitions was 26 percent.
It is alarming that almost a third of the H-1B visa cases are significantly delayed or denied by USCIS and employers are burdened with significant costs to respond to them and delay their projects. There is no logical reason why companies that are now more selective in hiring professional workers should face such advanced scrutiny where there is now more than twice the chance the application will be denied compared to prior years.
The L-1A visa is used by international companies to transfer managers and executives into the United States. Denial rates for L-1A petitions increased from 8 percent in FY 2007 to 14 percent in FY 2011. The Request for Evidence rate for L-1A petitions increased from 4 percent in FY 2004, to 24 percent in FY 2007, up to 51 percent in FY 2011.
The fact that during the most recent fiscal year, USCIS arbitrarily increased the denial rate or delay rate to half of the cases filed in this category of international managers or executives is outrageous. These are people we want to welcome to this country because they work for multinational corporations that make significant investments in the United States. They will not continue to do that if they will not be able to transfer their managers or executives from abroad to oversee expansion and similar projects.
The denial rates also increased for O-1A petitions, which are used for people with an extraordinary ability, who are in the top of their fields in the sciences, education, business, or athletics. Denials for O-1A petitions rose from 4 percent in FY 2008, to 10 percent just one year later in FY 2009, increased again to 11 percent in FY 2010, and stood at 8 percent in FY 2011. For O-1A petitions, the Request for Evidence rate increased from 1 percent in FY 2004, to 13 percent in FY 2007, and then more than doubled to 28 percent in FY 2009, 30 percent in FY 2010, and 27 percent in FY 2011.
This deliberate effort of USCIS to create additional hurdles on the O-1 visa applicants, who are the best and brightest in the world in what they do, is more than just bad for business. It is even worse for extraordinary researchers and scientists who are supposed to help us find cure to diseases or find the next new technology out there to solve many of our problems. These are the people the United States needs to attract and welcome with less hurdles, not more. Instead, the immigration agency is creating additional barriers to their entering the country by artificially increasing the heightened scrutiny and denial rates.
The best thing the immigration service can do is to make the process easier for all these professionals and companies because they are the kind of people we want to attract here and they represent the interests of billions of dollars in investments in this country. If USCIS wants to help create jobs, it needs to remove barriers to entry of the best and brightest, not create additional obstacles as it currently does. I think more employers now are willing to sue the government in order to protect their rights. We have helped a number of them do that successfully so there are options but they are more costly and difficult.
To read the NFAP report, go to: http://www.nfap.com/pdf/NFAP_Policy_Brief.USCIS_and_Denial_Rates_of_L1_and_H%201B_Petitions.February2012.pdf
Monday, February 27, 2012
GOVERNOR DEAL WILL NOT CHANGE HB87 DESPITE NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCES
Georgia Gov. Nathan Deal said he was not seeking changes to Georgia’s HB87 anti-illegal immigration law despite its negative consequences (which were largely unintended), such as agricultural workers shortages.
This is not a surprise considering the governor's history in signing anti-immigrant laws in Congress. He indicated he wanted to spend more time assessing how it is working. What this really means is that he does not really care about the economic impact and the labor shortages as long as they can say he was a supporter of the law.
Read the full story at:
http://www.ajc.com/news/georgia-government/deal-no-plans-to-1349378.html
This is not a surprise considering the governor's history in signing anti-immigrant laws in Congress. He indicated he wanted to spend more time assessing how it is working. What this really means is that he does not really care about the economic impact and the labor shortages as long as they can say he was a supporter of the law.
Read the full story at:
http://www.ajc.com/news/georgia-government/deal-no-plans-to-1349378.html
Wednesday, February 22, 2012
SB458 HEARING LATER TODAY
Georgia senate bill SB 458 has been assigned to the Senate Judiciary Committee and is scheduled for a hearing today, Wednesday, in room 450 at the Capitol at 4:00 pm.
Since the House bill to deny undocumented students access to all Georgia universities remains stalled (for now), a few folks in the Senate have now added similar provisions to SB 458. If you can attend or send letters to your senators, or call, we need to ask for the college ban to be amended out of the bill. Supporters of the ban were apparently meeting with Senators today to push the bill forward.
This bill is one that primarily corrects some of the imprecise language that was in HB 87 about the use and acceptance of "secure and verifiable documents." HOWEVER the bill also slips in a college ban provision by adding “post secondary education” to the official list of public benefits for which the undocumented are denied access. The message on SB 458 should be focused on asking committee members to REMOVE the "post secondary" language. Tell them that they shouldn’t allow this bill to be hijacked into the school-ban issue, which ban the Board of Regents Chancellor has confirmed many times is unnecessary and burdensome.
Take action now before it's too late!
Since the House bill to deny undocumented students access to all Georgia universities remains stalled (for now), a few folks in the Senate have now added similar provisions to SB 458. If you can attend or send letters to your senators, or call, we need to ask for the college ban to be amended out of the bill. Supporters of the ban were apparently meeting with Senators today to push the bill forward.
This bill is one that primarily corrects some of the imprecise language that was in HB 87 about the use and acceptance of "secure and verifiable documents." HOWEVER the bill also slips in a college ban provision by adding “post secondary education” to the official list of public benefits for which the undocumented are denied access. The message on SB 458 should be focused on asking committee members to REMOVE the "post secondary" language. Tell them that they shouldn’t allow this bill to be hijacked into the school-ban issue, which ban the Board of Regents Chancellor has confirmed many times is unnecessary and burdensome.
Take action now before it's too late!
Thursday, February 9, 2012
GEORGIA SENATE ASKS FEDS FOR MORE FARM WORKERS
Is this a joke? Probably not. The Georgia Senate unanimously approved a resolution Thursday asking Congress to expand the federal agricultural guest worker program. The resolution passed 53-0 Thursday was sponsored by a half dozen GOP senators.
More than 500 farmers surveyed recently by the state Department of Agriculture reporting losses of about $10 million in 2011 because of labor shortages.
This is after they enacted HB87, scared away all the immigrant farm workers from coming to Georgia, and now they complain that they can’t find enough migrant workers to harvest their crops. What they really need to do is rescind HB87 if they want to do something about the farm worker shortage in the state.
More than 500 farmers surveyed recently by the state Department of Agriculture reporting losses of about $10 million in 2011 because of labor shortages.
This is after they enacted HB87, scared away all the immigrant farm workers from coming to Georgia, and now they complain that they can’t find enough migrant workers to harvest their crops. What they really need to do is rescind HB87 if they want to do something about the farm worker shortage in the state.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)